VENIS PIYUSHBHAI MEKWAN vs C J FINANCE LTD-JIGNESHBHAI JAGDISHBHAI PANCHAL Advocate - J J NAIK — 520/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 22nd May 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJKH010068402025
Filing Number
520/2025
Filing Date
15-Oct-2025
Registration No
520/2025
Registration Date
15-Oct-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
22-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VENIS PIYUSHBHAI MEKWAN
Adv. M N MAKWANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.C J FINANCE LTD-JIGNESHBHAI JAGDISHBHAI PANCHAL Advocate - J J NAIK
-
2.STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. D R BAROT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
The Principal District Judge at Nadiad partially allowed Venis Piyushbhai Mecwan's appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a bounced cheque of Rs.46,394/-. While confirming the conviction, the court reduced the sentence from 6 months imprisonment and Rs.2,000 fine to time till rising of court and Rs.500 fine, considering that the appellant had paid the entire cheque amount to the complainant and the changed circumstances warranted leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
21-May-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
22-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
15-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 520/2025
The Principal District Judge at Nadiad partially allowed Venis Piyushbhai Mecwan's appeal against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a bounced cheque of Rs.46,394/-. While confirming the conviction, the court reduced the sentence from 6 months imprisonment and Rs.2,000 fine to time till rising of court and Rs.500 fine, considering that the appellant had paid the entire cheque amount to the complainant and the changed circumstances warranted leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts