ANKITKUMAR LAXMANBHAI PARMAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT — 2348/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJKH010068212025
Filing Number
2348/2025
Filing Date
14-Oct-2025
Registration No
2348/2025
Registration Date
14-Oct-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANKITKUMAR LAXMANBHAI PARMAR
Adv. O G MANSURI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Judegement
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Nadiad allowed Ankitkumar Lakshmanbhai Parmar's application to sue as an indigent person under Order-33, Rule-1 & 2 of the Civil Procedure Code. The State of Gujarat's reply failed to produce any cogent evidence to disprove the applicant's indigent status, and the court permitted him to file a motor accident compensation claim in forma pauperis, with court fees to be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
29-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
29-Nov-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2348/2025
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Nadiad allowed Ankitkumar Lakshmanbhai Parmar's application to sue as an indigent person under Order-33, Rule-1 & 2 of the Civil Procedure Code. The State of Gujarat's reply failed to produce any cogent evidence to disprove the applicant's indigent status, and the court permitted him to file a motor accident compensation claim in forma pauperis, with court fees to be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts