BHARTIBEN BHALABHAI CHAUHAN vs BHALABHAI MANGALBHAI CHAUHAN — 1017/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJKH010065652025

Filing Number

1017/2025

Filing Date

03-Oct-2025

Registration No

1017/2025

Registration Date

03-Oct-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARTIBEN BHALABHAI CHAUHAN

    Adv. D K DARJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHALABHAI MANGALBHAI CHAUHAN

  2. 2.BALVANTKUMAR MOHANBHAI DABHI

  3. 3.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

    Adv. S R SHELAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Lok Adalat approved a settlement between the applicant and insurance company in this motor accident claim, awarding Rs. 5,60,000/- (including Rs. 2,95,566/- in medical bills) to be paid jointly and severally by the respondents. The court ordered the amount to be deposited in a designated District Bank account with no court fee deduction, and disposed of the petition as compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  6. 29-Dec-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  7. 12-Nov-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  8. 03-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 03-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1017/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalat approved a settlement between the applicant and insurance company in this motor accident claim, awarding Rs. 5,60,000/- (including Rs. 2,95,566/- in medical bills) to be paid jointly and severally by the respondents. The court ordered the amount to be deposited in a designated District Bank account with no court fee deduction, and disposed of the petition as compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case