PRAVINKUMAR AJITSINH CHAUHAN vs DILIPSINH SON OF CHATARSINGH PANWAR — 917/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJKH010057572025
Filing Number
917/2025
Filing Date
28-Aug-2025
Registration No
917/2025
Registration Date
28-Aug-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAVINKUMAR AJITSINH CHAUHAN
Adv. H C PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.DILIPSINH SON OF CHATARSINGH PANWAR
-
2.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
Adv. A H PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Lok Adalat (M.A.C.T.) at Nadiad disposed of the motor accident compensation petition through a settlement between the applicant and the insurance company, awarding Rs. 7,50,000/- to the petitioner as compensation for injury/death caused by the undisputed accident. The respondents are directed to deposit the award amount in the District Bank Account via RTGS/NEFT, with no court fee deduction applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
02-Jan-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal District Judge
-
28-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 917/2025
The Lok Adalat (M.A.C.T.) at Nadiad disposed of the motor accident compensation petition through a settlement between the applicant and the insurance company, awarding Rs. 7,50,000/- to the petitioner as compensation for injury/death caused by the undisputed accident. The respondents are directed to deposit the award amount in the District Bank Account via RTGS/NEFT, with no court fee deduction applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts