HEIRS OF LATE AJAY HARISINH RATHOD(Legal Heir) vs SHAILESHBHAI BALVANTBHAI PARMAR Advocate - J J PATEL — 852/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJKH010053012025
Filing Number
852/2025
Filing Date
06-Aug-2025
Registration No
852/2025
Registration Date
06-Aug-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HEIRS OF LATE AJAY HARISINH RATHOD(Legal Heir)
Adv. T D DABHI1.
-
2.NEETABEN AJAYSINH RATHOD
Adv. T D DABHI1.
-
3.NEETABEN GUARDIAN OF MINOR ARYANSINH AJAYSINH RATHOD
Adv. T D DABHI1.
-
4.HARISINH UDESINH RATHOD
Adv. T D DABHI1.
-
5.ANSUYABEN HARISINH RATHOD
Adv. T D DABHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHAILESHBHAI BALVANTBHAI PARMAR Advocate - J J PATEL
-
2.SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
Adv. H J PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Lok Adalat (M.A.C.T.) disposed of a motor accident compensation petition through a settlement agreement between the applicant and insurance company. The applicant is entitled to Rs. 21,25,000/- (jointly and severally from respondents), which the insurance company must deposit in the specified district bank account via RTGS/NEFT without deducting court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
02-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
29-Nov-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
Written Statement
Principal District Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 852/2025
Summary The Lok Adalat (M.A.C.T.) disposed of a motor accident compensation petition through a settlement agreement between the applicant and insurance company. The applicant is entitled to Rs. 21,25,000/- (jointly and severally from respondents), which the insurance company must deposit in the specified district bank account via RTGS/NEFT without deducting court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts