STATE OF GUJARAT vs AJAYBHAI ALIAS JAID MAHESHBHAI RAJ Advocate - S K BHAVSAR — 15/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 140(4),117(2),115(2),352,351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 22nd April 2026.
ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO
CNR: GJKH010049862025
Filing Number
15/2025
Filing Date
22-07-2025
Registration No
15/2025
Registration Date
22-07-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
5-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204068250241
Police Station
VADTAL POLICE STATION – KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. Y K BAROT
Respondent(s)
AJAYBHAI ALIAS JAID MAHESHBHAI RAJ Advocate - S K BHAVSAR
CHIRAGKUMAR ALIAS BADI DILIPBHAI PATEL
Adv. S K BHAVSAR
PAVANKUMAR ALIAS PANNO MANOHARLAL SHARMA
Adv. S K BHAVSAR
Hearing History
Judge: 5-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 01-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 24-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: State of Gujarat v. Ajaybhai & Others (Special Atrocity Case 15/2025) Court's Decision: All three accused (Ajaybhai alias Jaid Maheshbhai Raj, Chiragkumar alias Badi Dilipbhai Patel, and Pavankumar alias Panno Manoharlal Sharma) were acquitted and discharged of charges under BNS Sections 140(4), 117(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 54, and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Sections 3(1)(R)(S) and 3(2)(P-A). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite accusations of assault, abduction, use of an iron rod to cause injury (including fracture to the complainant's thumb), and caste-based verbal abuse, the key witnesses—including the complainant himself and his wife—admitted during cross-examination that they could not identify who specifically used the weapon, could not confirm which individuals made caste-based slurs, and could not establish deliberate intent. The complainant acknowledged the injuries resulted from falling during a crowd scuffle rather than direct weapon assault. The absence of independent eyewitness testimony and corroborating medical evidence linking accused to specific acts rendered the prosecution's case insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: State of Gujarat v. Ajaybhai & Others (Special Atrocity Case 15/2025) Court's Decision: All three accused (Ajaybhai alias Jaid Maheshbhai Raj, Chiragkumar alias Badi Dilipbhai Patel, and Pavankumar alias Panno Manoharlal Sharma) were acquitted and discharged of charges under BNS Sections 140(4), 117(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 54, and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Sections 3(1)(R)(S) and 3(2)(P-A). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite accusations of assault, abduction, use of an iron rod to cause injury (including fracture to the complainant's thumb), and caste-based verbal abuse, the key witnesses—including the complainant himself and his wife—admitted during cross-examination that they could not identify who specifically used the weapon, could not confirm which individuals made caste-based slurs, and could not establish deliberate intent. The complainant acknowledged the injuries resulted from falling during a crowd scuffle rather than direct weapon assault. The absence of independent eyewitness testimony and corroborating medical evidence linking accused to specific acts rendered the prosecution's case insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts