STATE OF GUJARAT vs AJAYBHAI ALIAS JAID MAHESHBHAI RAJ Advocate - S K BHAVSAR — 15/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 140(4),117(2),115(2),352,351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 22nd April 2026.

ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO

CNR: GJKH010049862025

Case disposed

Filing Number

15/2025

Filing Date

22-07-2025

Registration No

15/2025

Registration Date

22-07-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

5-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

22nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204068250241

Police Station

VADTAL POLICE STATION – KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 140(4),117(2),115(2),352,351(3),54
SCHEDULED CASTS AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF TROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 3(1)(R),3(1)(S),3(2)(5-A)

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. Y K BAROT

Respondent(s)

AJAYBHAI ALIAS JAID MAHESHBHAI RAJ Advocate - S K BHAVSAR

CHIRAGKUMAR ALIAS BADI DILIPBHAI PATEL

Adv. S K BHAVSAR

PAVANKUMAR ALIAS PANNO MANOHARLAL SHARMA

Adv. S K BHAVSAR

Hearing History

Judge: 5-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

22-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

01-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

24-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

13-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

22-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

SUMMARY: State of Gujarat v. Ajaybhai & Others (Special Atrocity Case 15/2025) Court's Decision: All three accused (Ajaybhai alias Jaid Maheshbhai Raj, Chiragkumar alias Badi Dilipbhai Patel, and Pavankumar alias Panno Manoharlal Sharma) were acquitted and discharged of charges under BNS Sections 140(4), 117(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 54, and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Sections 3(1)(R)(S) and 3(2)(P-A). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite accusations of assault, abduction, use of an iron rod to cause injury (including fracture to the complainant's thumb), and caste-based verbal abuse, the key witnesses—including the complainant himself and his wife—admitted during cross-examination that they could not identify who specifically used the weapon, could not confirm which individuals made caste-based slurs, and could not establish deliberate intent. The complainant acknowledged the injuries resulted from falling during a crowd scuffle rather than direct weapon assault. The absence of independent eyewitness testimony and corroborating medical evidence linking accused to specific acts rendered the prosecution's case insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: State of Gujarat v. Ajaybhai & Others (Special Atrocity Case 15/2025) Court's Decision: All three accused (Ajaybhai alias Jaid Maheshbhai Raj, Chiragkumar alias Badi Dilipbhai Patel, and Pavankumar alias Panno Manoharlal Sharma) were acquitted and discharged of charges under BNS Sections 140(4), 117(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 54, and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Sections 3(1)(R)(S) and 3(2)(P-A). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Despite accusations of assault, abduction, use of an iron rod to cause injury (including fracture to the complainant's thumb), and caste-based verbal abuse, the key witnesses—including the complainant himself and his wife—admitted during cross-examination that they could not identify who specifically used the weapon, could not confirm which individuals made caste-based slurs, and could not establish deliberate intent. The complainant acknowledged the injuries resulted from falling during a crowd scuffle rather than direct weapon assault. The absence of independent eyewitness testimony and corroborating medical evidence linking accused to specific acts rendered the prosecution's case insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case