VIPULBHAI LAKSHMANBHAI RAVAL vs DEVIYANIBEN GIRISHBHAI BHANUSALI Advocate - K S MISTRY — 248/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 06th May 2026.
CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT
CNR: GJKH010048072022
Filing Number
248/2022
Filing Date
02-Nov-2022
Registration No
248/2022
Registration Date
02-Nov-2022
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIPULBHAI LAKSHMANBHAI RAVAL
Adv. J R PATHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEVIYANIBEN GIRISHBHAI BHANUSALI Advocate - K S MISTRY
-
2.INDIRABEN JAYPRAKASH BHANUSALI
Adv. M M ANSARI
-
3.CHANDRESH JADAVJI BHANUSALI
Adv. R G CHAUHAN
-
4.MISRIMAL RATANJI RAJPUROHIT
-
5.HINDUSTAN PETROLIUM CORPORATION VADODRA MANAGER SHREE
Adv. S R DUBEY
-
6.SEEMABEN CHANDRESHBHAI BHANUSALI
Adv. R G CHAUHAN
-
7.HAJI MAHAMMEDMUNAF HAJIABDULMAJID SHAIKH
-
8.HEIRS OF DECEASED MAHAMMEDRAFIK HAJIABDULMAJID SHAIKH(Legal Heir)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Order
The court dismissed the suit for default after the petitioner (Vipulbhai Lakshmanbhai Raval) and his advocate failed to appear on multiple scheduled dates despite proper notice. The respondents (Deviyaniben Girishbhai Bhanusali, Indiraben Jayprakash Bhanusali, and Chandresh Jadavji Bhanusali) also did not appear, but the court found no merit in continuing proceedings given the petitioner's repeated non-appearance, warranting dismissal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
20-Sep-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
14-Aug-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
19-Jul-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
19-Jun-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
30-May-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
06-May-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
07-Apr-2025
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
19-Mar-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
05-Mar-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
19-Feb-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
06-Feb-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
19-Dec-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
26-Sep-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
29-Aug-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
25-Jul-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
13-Jun-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
18-Apr-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
07-Mar-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
14-Feb-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
25-Jan-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
21-Dec-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
09-Nov-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
21-Sep-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
17-Aug-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
13-Jul-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
08-Jun-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
04-May-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
06-Apr-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
09-Mar-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
16-Feb-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
09-Feb-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
25-Jan-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
11-Jan-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
23-Dec-2022
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
08-Dec-2022
Notice To Opponents
Principal District Judge
-
15-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 248/2022
The court dismissed the suit for default after the petitioner (Vipulbhai Lakshmanbhai Raval) and his advocate failed to appear on multiple scheduled dates despite proper notice. The respondents (Deviyaniben Girishbhai Bhanusali, Indiraben Jayprakash Bhanusali, and Chandresh Jadavji Bhanusali) also did not appear, but the court found no merit in continuing proceedings given the petitioner's repeated non-appearance, warranting dismissal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts