STATE OF GUJARAT vs MAHENDRABHAI KABHAIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - M S SODHAPARMAR — 21/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th April 2026.
ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO
CNR: GJKH010043862024
Filing Number
21/2024
Filing Date
25-Jul-2024
Registration No
21/2024
Registration Date
25-Jul-2024
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
5-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204017240161
Police Station
CHAKLASHI POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. N S ROHIT
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHENDRABHAI KABHAIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - M S SODHAPARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary of Case 21/2024: State of Gujarat v. Mahendrabhai Kabhaibhai Parmar The Special Atrocity Court in Nadiad acquitted defendant Mahendrabhai Kabhaibhai Parmar of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2) and the SC/ST Atrocities Act Sections 3(1)(R)(S), 3(2)(5-A). The court found that while a dispute occurred between the complainant and defendant over borrowed money and land mortgage, the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that caste-based slurs were used or that the defendant threatened the complainant's life in public view. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
24-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
01-Jan-2026
Further Statement
4th Addl District Judge
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
29-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
03-Sep-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
12-Jun-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
4th Addl District Judge
-
08-May-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Apr-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
06-Mar-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Feb-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
21-Jan-2025
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
23-Dec-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
18-Nov-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
07-Oct-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Sep-2024
Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution
3rd Addl District Judge
-
07-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 21/2024
Summary of Case 21/2024: State of Gujarat v. Mahendrabhai Kabhaibhai Parmar The Special Atrocity Court in Nadiad acquitted defendant Mahendrabhai Kabhaibhai Parmar of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2) and the SC/ST Atrocities Act Sections 3(1)(R)(S), 3(2)(5-A). The court found that while a dispute occurred between the complainant and defendant over borrowed money and land mortgage, the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that caste-based slurs were used or that the defendant threatened the complainant's life in public view. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts