VIJAYKUMAR BHIKHABHAI BARAIYA vs DEVABHAI SAVABHAI BHARVAD Advocate - N J PATEL — 236/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJKH010026642024

Filing Number

236/2024

Filing Date

01-May-2024

Registration No

236/2024

Registration Date

01-May-2024

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

5-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYKUMAR BHIKHABHAI BARAIYA

    Adv. V G PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEVABHAI SAVABHAI BHARVAD Advocate - N J PATEL

  2. 2.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. D R BAROT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Court Decision The High Court of Gujarat has dismissed the appeal of the accused (original respondent Vijayakumar Bhikhabhai Bairaiya) against a lower court conviction. The court upheld the trial court's judgment convicting the appellant under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs. 7,00,000. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 7,05,000 with six months simple imprisonment in default, plus ordered to compensate the complainant Rs. 7,00,000 within 15 days. The court found the appellant failed to rebut legal presumptions favoring the complainant and found the trial court's findings were justified by the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Order

    4th Addl District Judge

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Order

    4th Addl District Judge

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Order

    4th Addl District Judge

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  9. 24-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  10. 17-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  11. 27-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  12. 01-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  13. 09-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  14. 18-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  15. 04-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  16. 13-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  17. 23-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  18. 26-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  19. 29-May-2025

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  20. 12-May-2025

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  21. 17-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  22. 27-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  23. 30-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  24. 26-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  25. 05-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  26. 07-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  27. 26-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  28. 08-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  29. 04-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  30. 19-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  31. 01-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 01-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 236/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Decision The High Court of Gujarat has dismissed the appeal of the accused (original respondent Vijayakumar Bhikhabhai Bairaiya) against a lower court conviction. The court upheld the trial court's judgment convicting the appellant under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 for issuing a dishonored cheque of Rs. 7,00,000. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 7,05,000 with six months simple imprisonment in default, plus ordered to compensate the complainant Rs. 7,00,000 within 15 days. The court found the appellant failed to rebut legal presumptions favoring the complainant and found the trial court's findings were justified by the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case