CHANDUBHAI BHEMABHAI CHUNARA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 302/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 27th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKH010015922026
Filing Number
302/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
302/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
3-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204040250416
Police Station
MATAR POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHANDUBHAI BHEMABHAI CHUNARA
Adv. A B VAGHELA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 302/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the accused's plea for bail and remanded him to judicial custody. The accused, Chandubhai Bhemabhai Chunara, was charged under IPC Section 498A (cruelty to spouse) for allegedly subjecting his sister-in-law to repeated sexual assault, causing her pregnancy, which amounts to a grave offense. The court found sufficient grounds in the charge sheet and rejected arguments about his family responsibilities and clean criminal record, determining that bail conditions could not adequately ensure witness safety or his trial attendance given the serious nature of the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 302/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the accused's plea for bail and remanded him to judicial custody. The accused, Chandubhai Bhemabhai Chunara, was charged under IPC Section 498A (cruelty to spouse) for allegedly subjecting his sister-in-law to repeated sexual assault, causing her pregnancy, which amounts to a grave offense. The court found sufficient grounds in the charge sheet and rejected arguments about his family responsibilities and clean criminal record, determining that bail conditions could not adequately ensure witness safety or his trial attendance given the serious nature of the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts