DURGAPRASAD MOHANRAM CHOKHARAM JAT vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 299/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKH010015892026
Filing Number
299/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
299/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
5-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204046260105
Police Station
NADIAD TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DURGAPRASAD MOHANRAM CHOKHARAM JAT
Adv. K B SONI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT
Hearing History
Judge: 5-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 299/2026 Court Decision: The court REJECTED the bail application of petitioner Durgaprasad Mohanram Chokharam Jat. The petitioner was accused of violating the Prohibition Act and BNS provisions related to illegal inter-state liquor smuggling. Despite arguments that the investigation was ongoing and the petitioner had no criminal history, the court found the charges serious and the investigation incomplete, with co-accused still at large. The court determined that granting bail could adversely affect the investigation and denied regular bail under CrPC Section 439. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 299/2026 Court Decision: The court REJECTED the bail application of petitioner Durgaprasad Mohanram Chokharam Jat. The petitioner was accused of violating the Prohibition Act and BNS provisions related to illegal inter-state liquor smuggling. Despite arguments that the investigation was ongoing and the petitioner had no criminal history, the court found the charges serious and the investigation incomplete, with co-accused still at large. The court determined that granting bail could adversely affect the investigation and denied regular bail under CrPC Section 439. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts