GHANSHYAMBHAI CHANDUBHAI ZALA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 293/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKH010015722026
Filing Number
293/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
293/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
6-3rd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204039260004
Police Station
MAHUDHA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GHANSHYAMBHAI CHANDUBHAI ZALA
Adv. H K SHAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Cri. Misc. App. No. 293/2026 Court Decision: The 3rd Additional Sessions Court, Nadiad rejected Ghanshyambhai Chandubhai Zala's bail application under BNS 2023 Section 483. The court found that the appellant, as a key accused in an alleged prohibited liquor smuggling case, posed risks of absconding, tampering with evidence, and committing further crimes. Despite acknowledging the principle "Bail is the Rule and Committal to Jail an Exception," the court concluded that the gravity of charges involving drug trafficking, ongoing investigation of absconding co-accused, and rising substance abuse concerns justified denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 293/2026
Case Summary: Cri. Misc. App. No. 293/2026 Court Decision: The 3rd Additional Sessions Court, Nadiad rejected Ghanshyambhai Chandubhai Zala's bail application under BNS 2023 Section 483. The court found that the appellant, as a key accused in an alleged prohibited liquor smuggling case, posed risks of absconding, tampering with evidence, and committing further crimes. Despite acknowledging the principle "Bail is the Rule and Committal to Jail an Exception," the court concluded that the gravity of charges involving drug trafficking, ongoing investigation of absconding co-accused, and rising substance abuse concerns justified denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts