SATISHBHAI TIRTHBHAI VAGHELA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 284/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKH010015002026
Filing Number
284/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
284/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
6-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1120403926004
Police Station
MAHUDHA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SATISHBHAI TIRTHBHAI VAGHELA
Adv. A V PARMAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT
Hearing History
Judge: 6-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Satishbhai Tirthbhai Vaghela v. State of Gujarat (Cri. Misc. App. 284/2026) The 3rd Additional Sessions Court, Nadiad rejected the regular bail application of Satishbhai Tirthbhai Vaghela under BNS 2023 Section 483. The petitioner was arrested for importing and distributing foreign liquor under the Prohibition Act and IPC provisions (Sections 336(2), 340(2)). The court found that the petitioner played a central role in a criminal syndicate, other accused remain absconding, and granting bail would encourage similar offenses and obstruct justice in an ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Satishbhai Tirthbhai Vaghela v. State of Gujarat (Cri. Misc. App. 284/2026) The 3rd Additional Sessions Court, Nadiad rejected the regular bail application of Satishbhai Tirthbhai Vaghela under BNS 2023 Section 483. The petitioner was arrested for importing and distributing foreign liquor under the Prohibition Act and IPC provisions (Sections 336(2), 340(2)). The court found that the petitioner played a central role in a criminal syndicate, other accused remain absconding, and granting bail would encourage similar offenses and obstruct justice in an ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts