PRAVINBHAI ALIAS BHETO BHARATBHAI NANJIBHAI VAGHELA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 283/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKH010014642026
Filing Number
283/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
283/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
6-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204041251258
Police Station
MAHEMDAVAD POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAVINBHAI ALIAS BHETO BHARATBHAI NANJIBHAI VAGHELA
Adv. R M RAVAL
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT
Hearing History
Judge: 6-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the petitioner's application for bail and land release under IPC Section 438 and CrPC Section 438. The court found credible evidence that the petitioner sexually abused a minor girl (14 years, 1 month, 20 days old), sent inappropriate messages, and conspired with others to threaten and intimidate the victim and her family. Despite arguments for bail, the court determined that the charges were serious, the evidence strong, and the petitioner posed a flight risk and threat to witnesses, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the petitioner's application for bail and land release under IPC Section 438 and CrPC Section 438. The court found credible evidence that the petitioner sexually abused a minor girl (14 years, 1 month, 20 days old), sent inappropriate messages, and conspired with others to threaten and intimidate the victim and her family. Despite arguments for bail, the court determined that the charges were serious, the evidence strong, and the petitioner posed a flight risk and threat to witnesses, making bail inappropriate at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts