VINODBHAI MANUBHAI TALPADA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 280/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKH010014512026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

280/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

280/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

5-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204045260018

Police Station

NADIAD RURAL POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 439,
THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 305(D),331(3),331(4),

Petitioner(s)

VINODBHAI MANUBHAI TALPADA

Adv. D V TALPADA

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT

Hearing History

Judge: 5-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

12-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Kheda at Nadiad rejected Vinodbhai Manubhai Talpada's bail application for charges under Sections 305(d) and 331(3)(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (temple theft involving Rs. 1,90,050 in gold, silver, and cash). The court found a prima facie case against the applicant, noting he is a habitual offender with a history of multiple serious crimes including theft, assault, and gambling offenses, presenting risks of tampering with evidence and witness intimidation during the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Kheda at Nadiad rejected Vinodbhai Manubhai Talpada's bail application for charges under Sections 305(d) and 331(3)(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (temple theft involving Rs. 1,90,050 in gold, silver, and cash). The court found a prima facie case against the applicant, noting he is a habitual offender with a history of multiple serious crimes including theft, assault, and gambling offenses, presenting risks of tampering with evidence and witness intimidation during the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case