DALPATSINH VAJESINH ALIAS BABUBHAI PARMAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 279/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKH010014502026

Filing Number

279/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

279/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

5-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204021250387

Police Station

DAKOR POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(2)
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(2)
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AE,81,116B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DALPATSINH VAJESINH ALIAS BABUBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. V S DABHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Court in Nadiad (Kheda District) granted 30 days of interim bail to accused Dalpatsinh Vajsinh (Babubhai Parmar) under IPC Sections 483(2), 439(1), and 439(2), considering his wife's critical medical condition requiring urgent coronary angiography or bypass surgery and the need for his financial support and caregiving during her treatment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 279/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Court in Nadiad (Kheda District) granted 30 days of interim bail to accused Dalpatsinh Vajsinh (Babubhai Parmar) under IPC Sections 483(2), 439(1), and 439(2), considering his wife's critical medical condition requiring urgent coronary angiography or bypass surgery and the need for his financial support and caregiving during her treatment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case