VIVEKKUMAR MANISHBHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 278/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKH010014422026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

278/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

278/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

7-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204025260126

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 439,
THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 118(1),118(2),352,351(2),
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135,

Petitioner(s)

VIVEKKUMAR MANISHBHAI PATEL

Adv. H A BHATT

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT

Hearing History

Judge: 7-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

HEARING

09-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
ORDER

Court Decision Summary The 5th Additional District & Sessions Judge at Kheda granted bail to Vivekkumar Manishbhai Patel, charged with assault and criminal intimidation under BNS 2023 sections 118(1), 118(2), 352, and 351(2) for allegedly attacking a female colleague with a cutter. The court found the offences magistrate-triable, the victim discharged and safe, the applicant a permanent resident with no criminal antecedents, and prolonged custody without bail would constitute pre-trial conviction, warranting release on ₹15,000 bail with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The 5th Additional District & Sessions Judge at Kheda granted bail to Vivekkumar Manishbhai Patel, charged with assault and criminal intimidation under BNS 2023 sections 118(1), 118(2), 352, and 351(2) for allegedly attacking a female colleague with a cutter. The court found the offences magistrate-triable, the victim discharged and safe, the applicant a permanent resident with no criminal antecedents, and prolonged custody without bail would constitute pre-trial conviction, warranting release on ₹15,000 bail with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case