MUKESH MOHANBHAI CHAUHAN vs RAVI PRABHUDAS BRAHMBHATT Advocate - D M BRAHMBHATT — 114/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJKH010014392026

Case disposed

Filing Number

114/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

114/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3)
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

MUKESH MOHANBHAI CHAUHAN

Adv. P M ROHIT

Respondent(s)

RAVI PRABHUDAS BRAHMBHATT Advocate - D M BRAHMBHATT

STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. D R BAROT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court dismissed the appeal filed by Mukesh Mohanbhai Chauhan against the lower court's conviction order dated 09/02/2026, which imposed one month imprisonment, a fine of Rs. 3,000, and additional penalties. However, during the appeal proceedings, a settlement was reached between the appellant and respondent, with the appellant paying the required cheque amount, and the court noted no outstanding criminal liability remained, permitting the lower court judgment to stand while vacating the conviction order based on the settlement reached under the Negotiable Instruments Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the appeal filed by Mukesh Mohanbhai Chauhan against the lower court's conviction order dated 09/02/2026, which imposed one month imprisonment, a fine of Rs. 3,000, and additional penalties. However, during the appeal proceedings, a settlement was reached between the appellant and respondent, with the appellant paying the required cheque amount, and the court noted no outstanding criminal liability remained, permitting the lower court judgment to stand while vacating the conviction order based on the settlement reached under the Negotiable Instruments Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case