LILABEN SHIVABHAI SODHAPARMAR(Legal Heir) vs CHOLA MANDLAM GENERAL INSURACE CO. LTD. — 462/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 18th May 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJKH010014052026

Filing Number

462/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

462/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

5-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

18-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 141

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LILABEN SHIVABHAI SODHAPARMAR(Legal Heir)

    Adv. L R GOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHOLA MANDLAM GENERAL INSURACE CO. LTD.

  2. 2.PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court allowed Lilaben Shivabhai Sodhaparmar's application for premature withdrawal of two fixed deposits totaling Rs. 50,000 principal plus accrued interest from Punjab National Bank. The court found her financial hardship justified—she had arranged her son's marriage, lost her husband, and has no income source—and granted the relief in the interest of justice, with the insurance company offering no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-May-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 02-May-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  6. 03-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 462/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Lilaben Shivabhai Sodhaparmar's application for premature withdrawal of two fixed deposits totaling Rs. 50,000 principal plus accrued interest from Punjab National Bank. The court found her financial hardship justified—she had arranged her son's marriage, lost her husband, and has no income source—and granted the relief in the interest of justice, with the insurance company offering no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case