RASHMIKABEN BHAVINKUMAR BHOI vs SHIVKRUPA FINANCE PROPRIETOR GEETABEN MITESHBHAI RANA Advocate - R G CHAUHAN — 112/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJKH010013892026

Filing Number

112/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

112/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3)
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RASHMIKABEN BHAVINKUMAR BHOI

    Adv. K G CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIVKRUPA FINANCE PROPRIETOR GEETABEN MITESHBHAI RANA Advocate - R G CHAUHAN

  2. 2.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. D R BAROT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The appeal was allowed and the lower court's order dated 12.02.2026 was set aside. The court found that a settlement had been reached between the appellant (Rashmikaben Bhavinkumar Bhoi) and the respondent (Shivkrupa Finance) during the appeal proceedings, with the check amount already paid, making further proceedings unnecessary. The appellant was acquitted of the criminal charge under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, and her property attachment was ordered to be canceled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The appeal was allowed and the lower court's order dated 12.02.2026 was set aside. The court found that a settlement had been reached between the appellant (Rashmikaben Bhavinkumar Bhoi) and the respondent (Shivkrupa Finance) during the appeal proceedings, with the check amount already paid, making further proceedings unnecessary. The appellant was acquitted of the criminal charge under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, and her property attachment was ordered to be canceled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case