HEIRS OF LATE VIMLABEN DHANABHAI PARMAR(Legal Heir) vs ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. — 452/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJKH010013602026

Filing Number

452/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

452/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 141

Petitioner(s)

1.HEIRS OF LATE VIMLABEN DHANABHAI PARMAR(Legal Heir)

Adv. V B RATHOD1.
2.LALJIBHAI DHANABHAI PARMAR

Adv. V B RATHOD

Respondent(s)

1.ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
16-Mar-2026

Order

Case Summary: MACMA No. 452/2026 The Principal District Judge of Kheda at Nadiad ordered ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. to pay Rs. 2,52,793 to claimant Laljibhai Dhanabhai Parmar via bank transfer, following the Gujarat High Court's directive in F.A. No. 2089/2025. The amount was deposited after deducting Rs. 4,450 towards court fee stamp dues. Payment must be made upon personal identification, with the bank restricted from advancing loans against the deposited amount but permitted to credit periodic interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
16-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal District Judge
10-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
03-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 452/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MACMA No. 452/2026 The Principal District Judge of Kheda at Nadiad ordered ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. to pay Rs. 2,52,793 to claimant Laljibhai Dhanabhai Parmar via bank transfer, following the Gujarat High Court's directive in F.A. No. 2089/2025. The amount was deposited after deducting Rs. 4,450 towards court fee stamp dues. Payment must be made upon personal identification, with the bank restricted from advancing loans against the deposited amount but permitted to credit periodic interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.