PAPPU RATAN MANGILAL CHAUHAN (CHAMAR) vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 262/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKH010013402026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
262/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
262/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
6-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PAPPU RATAN MANGILAL CHAUHAN (CHAMAR)
Adv. A V PARMAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT
Hearing History
Judge: 6-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected Pappu Ratan Mangilal Chauhan's bail application for alleged Prohibition Act violations involving contraband liquor worth Rs. 93,31,200. The judge found a strong prima facie case against the accused, noting risks of absconding, repeat offenses, witness tampering, and investigation obstruction given that co-accused remain absconded and no new circumstances had emerged since the previous rejected bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected Pappu Ratan Mangilal Chauhan's bail application for alleged Prohibition Act violations involving contraband liquor worth Rs. 93,31,200. The judge found a strong prima facie case against the accused, noting risks of absconding, repeat offenses, witness tampering, and investigation obstruction given that co-accused remain absconded and no new circumstances had emerged since the previous rejected bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts