ALPESHBHAI MADHUSINH RATHOD GUARDIAN OF MINOR MAHIPALSINH SHANKARBHAI SOLANKI vs SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD — 439/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJKH010013202026

Filing Number

439/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

439/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 141

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALPESHBHAI MADHUSINH RATHOD GUARDIAN OF MINOR MAHIPALSINH SHANKARBHAI SOLANKI

    Adv. H C PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Principal District Judge at Kheda, Nadiad approved the insurance company's deposit of Rs. 4,65,000/- in a motor accident claim case. The court ordered Rs. 1,85,000/- for medical bills be paid directly to the guardian's bank account, while Rs. 2,80,000/- be invested in a fixed deposit until the minor reaches majority or 5 years (whichever is later), with the bank prohibited from giving loans against the FD without tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 439/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District Judge at Kheda, Nadiad approved the insurance company's deposit of Rs. 4,65,000/- in a motor accident claim case. The court ordered Rs. 1,85,000/- for medical bills be paid directly to the guardian's bank account, while Rs. 2,80,000/- be invested in a fixed deposit until the minor reaches majority or 5 years (whichever is later), with the bank prohibited from giving loans against the FD without tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case