BHIKHABHAI PARSHOTTAMBHAI PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 256/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKH010013072026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
256/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
256/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
5-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204041260018
Police Station
MAHEMDAVAD POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHIKHABHAI PARSHOTTAMBHAI PATEL
Adv. A T BAJPAI
GHANSHYAMGIRI BALGIRI GOSAI
Adv. A T BAJPAI
MAHESHKUMAR NATUBHAI PATEL
Adv. A T BAJPAI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT
Hearing History
Judge: 5-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 03-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Kheda rejected the bail application of three applicants accused of defrauding the Irrigation Department through false land documents and obtaining ₹44,88,000 in illegal compensation. The court found a prima facie case established against the applicants, who allegedly signed as witnesses on false pedigree documents, and determined that ongoing investigation requires their continued custodial interrogation, with risk of absconding if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Kheda rejected the bail application of three applicants accused of defrauding the Irrigation Department through false land documents and obtaining ₹44,88,000 in illegal compensation. The court found a prima facie case established against the applicants, who allegedly signed as witnesses on false pedigree documents, and determined that ongoing investigation requires their continued custodial interrogation, with risk of absconding if released. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts