SATISHKUMAR RANGITSINH PADHIYAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 251/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKH010012842026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
251/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
251/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
3-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SATISHKUMAR RANGITSINH PADHIYAR
Adv. G L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted bail to the accused in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 251/2026 under IPC Section 498A (dowry-related offense). The court found that the investigation was complete, the accused was a young man (20 years old) with no criminal history, a local resident, and posed no flight risk or danger to witnesses. The court ordered his release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with specific conditions including cooperation with police investigation, maintaining court appearances, and not leaving Gujarat without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted bail to the accused in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 251/2026 under IPC Section 498A (dowry-related offense). The court found that the investigation was complete, the accused was a young man (20 years old) with no criminal history, a local resident, and posed no flight risk or danger to witnesses. The court ordered his release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with specific conditions including cooperation with police investigation, maintaining court appearances, and not leaving Gujarat without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts