VIKASBHAI RAJUBHAI RABARI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 250/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKH010012832026

Filing Number

250/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

250/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

3-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 75,78(2)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKASBHAI RAJUBHAI RABARI

    Adv. M S RABARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The court granted bail to the accused in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 250/2026 under IPC Section 483 (land-related offense). The accused was released on a personal bond of ₹10,000 with a surety bond of equal amount, subject to specific conditions including regular police reporting, travel restrictions without court permission, and cooperation with the investigation. The court found insufficient prima facie evidence of the charges alleged and determined the accused was entitled to bail pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 250/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted bail to the accused in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 250/2026 under IPC Section 483 (land-related offense). The accused was released on a personal bond of ₹10,000 with a surety bond of equal amount, subject to specific conditions including regular police reporting, travel restrictions without court permission, and cooperation with the investigation. The court found insufficient prima facie evidence of the charges alleged and determined the accused was entitled to bail pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case