VIKASBHAI RAJUBHAI RABARI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 250/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKH010012832026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

250/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

250/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

3-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 439,
THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 75,78(2),
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 12,

Petitioner(s)

VIKASBHAI RAJUBHAI RABARI

Adv. M S RABARI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

06-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

HEARING

03-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court granted bail to the accused in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 250/2026 under IPC Section 483 (land-related offense). The accused was released on a personal bond of ₹10,000 with a surety bond of equal amount, subject to specific conditions including regular police reporting, travel restrictions without court permission, and cooperation with the investigation. The court found insufficient prima facie evidence of the charges alleged and determined the accused was entitled to bail pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted bail to the accused in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 250/2026 under IPC Section 483 (land-related offense). The accused was released on a personal bond of ₹10,000 with a surety bond of equal amount, subject to specific conditions including regular police reporting, travel restrictions without court permission, and cooperation with the investigation. The court found insufficient prima facie evidence of the charges alleged and determined the accused was entitled to bail pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case