DILIP SURESHBHAI VAGHELA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 245/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKH010012412026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

245/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

245/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

3-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 439,
THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 137(2),75(2),78(2),87,
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 7,8,11(4),12,
SCHEDULED CASTS AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF TROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 3(1)(w)(ii),3(2)(va),3(1)(w)(i),

Petitioner(s)

DILIP SURESHBHAI VAGHELA

Adv. J M RAJPARMAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

06-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

HEARING

28-02-2026

HEARING

27-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary In Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 245/2026, a Gujarat court rejected the accused's petition for bail and upheld land confiscation orders. The court found that the accused committed serious offenses under the Indian Penal Code and Pocso Act against a minor, including kidnapping, sexual abuse, and physical assault. The court determined that despite the accused's claims of innocence, substantial evidence and investigation findings supported the grave charges, and therefore ordered the petition dismissed with the bail request denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary In Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 245/2026, a Gujarat court rejected the accused's petition for bail and upheld land confiscation orders. The court found that the accused committed serious offenses under the Indian Penal Code and Pocso Act against a minor, including kidnapping, sexual abuse, and physical assault. The court determined that despite the accused's claims of innocence, substantial evidence and investigation findings supported the grave charges, and therefore ordered the petition dismissed with the bail request denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case