DILIP SURESHBHAI VAGHELA vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 245/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKH010012412026
Filing Number
245/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
245/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
3-2nd Addl District Judge
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DILIP SURESHBHAI VAGHELA
Adv. J M RAJPARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
Judegement
Court Decision Summary In Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 245/2026, a Gujarat court rejected the accused's petition for bail and upheld land confiscation orders. The court found that the accused committed serious offenses under the Indian Penal Code and Pocso Act against a minor, including kidnapping, sexual abuse, and physical assault. The court determined that despite the accused's claims of innocence, substantial evidence and investigation findings supported the grave charges, and therefore ordered the petition dismissed with the bail request denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
2nd Addl District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 245/2026
Court Decision Summary In Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 245/2026, a Gujarat court rejected the accused's petition for bail and upheld land confiscation orders. The court found that the accused committed serious offenses under the Indian Penal Code and Pocso Act against a minor, including kidnapping, sexual abuse, and physical assault. The court determined that despite the accused's claims of innocence, substantial evidence and investigation findings supported the grave charges, and therefore ordered the petition dismissed with the bail request denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts