HEIRS LATE BHUPATSINH ALIAS BHUPATBHAI ALIAS BHUPENDRASINH BHAVSINH CHAUHAN(Legal Heir) vs STATE OF GUJARAT — 415/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJKH010012322026

Filing Number

415/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

415/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 141

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEIRS LATE BHUPATSINH ALIAS BHUPATBHAI ALIAS BHUPENDRASINH BHAVSINH CHAUHAN(Legal Heir)

    Adv. R R PATEL1.

  2. 2.GEETABEN BHUPATBHAI CHAUHAN

    Adv. R R PATEL1.

  3. 3.SHIVRAJSINH BHUPENDRASINH CHAUHAN

    Adv. R R PATEL1.

  4. 4.VANRAJSINH BHUPATSINH CHAUHAN

    Adv. R R PATEL1.

  5. 5.AMBABEN BHAVSINH CHAUHAN

    Adv. R R PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Nadiad allowed the heirs of Bhupatsinh Chauhan's application to sue as an indigent person under Order-33, Civil Procedure Code. The court found the applicants lacked sufficient means to pay court fees for their compensation claim and that no legal bars existed. The tribunal permitted them to file their motor accident claim petition in forma pauperis, with court fees to be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 415/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Nadiad allowed the heirs of Bhupatsinh Chauhan's application to sue as an indigent person under Order-33, Civil Procedure Code. The court found the applicants lacked sufficient means to pay court fees for their compensation claim and that no legal bars existed. The tribunal permitted them to file their motor accident claim petition in forma pauperis, with court fees to be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case