FALGUNI DIPAKKUMAR MALVI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 233/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJKH010011972026
Filing Number
233/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
233/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
5-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204041260142
Police Station
MAHEMDAVAD POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FALGUNI DIPAKKUMAR MALVI
Adv. C M SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary: The 4th Additional Sessions Judge at Kheda, Nadiad granted anticipatory bail to Falguni Dipakkumar Malvi, a 25-year-old woman accused under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (cheating/fraud) for allegedly extracting Rs. 75,60,000 from the complainant through deceptive romantic overtures over four years. The court held that since the applicant is a woman with no criminal history, no custodial interrogation is necessary, and the presumption of innocence favors her release on bail with conditions including furnishing personal bonds of Rs. 15,000, passport deposit, non-interference with witnesses, and territorial restrictions within Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Order
4th Addl District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Order
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 233/2026
Summary: The 4th Additional Sessions Judge at Kheda, Nadiad granted anticipatory bail to Falguni Dipakkumar Malvi, a 25-year-old woman accused under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (cheating/fraud) for allegedly extracting Rs. 75,60,000 from the complainant through deceptive romantic overtures over four years. The court held that since the applicant is a woman with no criminal history, no custodial interrogation is necessary, and the presumption of innocence favors her release on bail with conditions including furnishing personal bonds of Rs. 15,000, passport deposit, non-interference with witnesses, and territorial restrictions within Gujarat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts