DILIPBHAI VASANTBHAI PANCHOLI vs C J FINANCE LTD - JIGNESHBHAI JAGDISHBHAI PANCHAL Advocate - J J NAIK — 89/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJKH010010832026

Case disposed

Filing Number

89/2026

Filing Date

20-02-2026

Registration No

89/2026

Registration Date

20-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3)
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

DILIPBHAI VASANTBHAI PANCHOLI

Adv. C M SHARMA

Respondent(s)

C J FINANCE LTD - JIGNESHBHAI JAGDISHBHAI PANCHAL Advocate - J J NAIK

STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. D R BAROT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court allowed the appeal after the parties reached a settlement during the pendency of the appeal. The petitioner (Dilipbhai Vasantbhai Pancholi) and respondent C J Finance Ltd settled their dispute, with the respondent confirming that the check debt had been paid and no further liability remained. The original lower court judgment dated 22/01/2026 awarding imprisonment and interest on a check bounce case was set aside, and the petitioner was acquitted of charges under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the appeal after the parties reached a settlement during the pendency of the appeal. The petitioner (Dilipbhai Vasantbhai Pancholi) and respondent C J Finance Ltd settled their dispute, with the respondent confirming that the check debt had been paid and no further liability remained. The original lower court judgment dated 22/01/2026 awarding imprisonment and interest on a check bounce case was set aside, and the petitioner was acquitted of charges under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case