DILIPBHAI VASANTBHAI PANCHOLI vs C J FINANCE LTD - JIGNESHBHAI JAGDISHBHAI PANCHAL Advocate - J J NAIK — 89/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3). Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJKH010010832026

Filing Number

89/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

89/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3)
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DILIPBHAI VASANTBHAI PANCHOLI

    Adv. C M SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.C J FINANCE LTD - JIGNESHBHAI JAGDISHBHAI PANCHAL Advocate - J J NAIK

  2. 2.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. D R BAROT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court allowed the appeal after the parties reached a settlement during the pendency of the appeal. The petitioner (Dilipbhai Vasantbhai Pancholi) and respondent C J Finance Ltd settled their dispute, with the respondent confirming that the check debt had been paid and no further liability remained. The original lower court judgment dated 22/01/2026 awarding imprisonment and interest on a check bounce case was set aside, and the petitioner was acquitted of charges under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the appeal after the parties reached a settlement during the pendency of the appeal. The petitioner (Dilipbhai Vasantbhai Pancholi) and respondent C J Finance Ltd settled their dispute, with the respondent confirming that the check debt had been paid and no further liability remained. The original lower court judgment dated 22/01/2026 awarding imprisonment and interest on a check bounce case was set aside, and the petitioner was acquitted of charges under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case