MAHENDRABHAI SHANABHAI PARMAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT — 381/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJKH010010382026

Filing Number

381/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

381/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 141

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHENDRABHAI SHANABHAI PARMAR

    Adv. D V PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Order

    Case Summary: 381/2026 The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (M.A.C.T.), Kheda at Nadiad, allowed Mahendrabhai Shanabhai Parmar's application to sue as an indigent person under Order-33, Rules 1-2 of the Civil Procedure Code. The State of Gujarat's reply denying the application lacked supporting evidence to disprove the applicant's claims. The court permitted him to file a motor accident compensation claim in forma pauperis, with court fees to be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on any decree awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 01-May-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 381/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 381/2026 The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (M.A.C.T.), Kheda at Nadiad, allowed Mahendrabhai Shanabhai Parmar's application to sue as an indigent person under Order-33, Rules 1-2 of the Civil Procedure Code. The State of Gujarat's reply denying the application lacked supporting evidence to disprove the applicant's claims. The court permitted him to file a motor accident compensation claim in forma pauperis, with court fees to be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on any decree awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case