SHITALBEN VIKRAMSINH MANDOLA vs STATE OF GUJARAT — 380/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJKH010010372026
Filing Number
380/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
380/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHITALBEN VIKRAMSINH MANDOLA
Adv. P J VYAS
Respondent(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Nadiad allowed Shitalben Vikramsinh Mandola's application to sue as an indigent person (in forma pauperis) under Order-33, Rule-1 & 2 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court found no cogent evidence from the State of Gujarat to disprove the applicant's indigent status and permitted her to file a motor accident compensation claim without paying court fees upfront; fees would be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Nadiad allowed Shitalben Vikramsinh Mandola's application to sue as an indigent person (in forma pauperis) under Order-33, Rule-1 & 2 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court found no cogent evidence from the State of Gujarat to disprove the applicant's indigent status and permitted her to file a motor accident compensation claim without paying court fees upfront; fees would be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts