SHITALBEN VIKRAMSINH MANDOLA vs STATE OF GUJARAT — 380/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJKH010010372026
Filing Number
380/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
380/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHITALBEN VIKRAMSINH MANDOLA
Adv. P J VYAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Judegement
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Nadiad allowed Shitalben Vikramsinh Mandola's application to sue as an indigent person (in forma pauperis) under Order-33, Rule-1 & 2 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court found no cogent evidence from the State of Gujarat to disprove the applicant's indigent status and permitted her to file a motor accident compensation claim without paying court fees upfront; fees would be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 380/2026
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Nadiad allowed Shitalben Vikramsinh Mandola's application to sue as an indigent person (in forma pauperis) under Order-33, Rule-1 & 2 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court found no cogent evidence from the State of Gujarat to disprove the applicant's indigent status and permitted her to file a motor accident compensation claim without paying court fees upfront; fees would be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts