KIRTIRAJSINH RANADIPSINH SOLANKI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 188/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKH010009052026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

188/2026

Filing Date

16-02-2026

Registration No

188/2026

Registration Date

16-02-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

6-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 439,
THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 108,85,115(2),54,

Petitioner(s)

KIRTIRAJSINH RANADIPSINH SOLANKI

Adv. D R BRAHMBHATT

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT

Hearing History

Judge: 6-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

12-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

HEARING

06-03-2026

HEARING

25-02-2026

HEARING

23-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary The 3rd Additional Sessions Court, Nadiad rejected the regular bail application of Kirtirajsinh Randeepsinh Solanki under BNS Section 483 (CrPC Section 439). The applicant was accused of demanding dowry, causing physical and mental harassment to his wife, and abetting her suicide along with her 21-month-old daughter on 20.11.2025. The court found prima facie evidence in the chargesheet and statements that the accused demanded ₹2 lakhs dowry and, when unsatisfied, subjected his wife to sustained cruelty and dushprerna (abetment), ultimately driving her to commit suicide with their child. The bail was denied to prevent potential witness intimidation and to deter crimes against women. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The 3rd Additional Sessions Court, Nadiad rejected the regular bail application of Kirtirajsinh Randeepsinh Solanki under BNS Section 483 (CrPC Section 439). The applicant was accused of demanding dowry, causing physical and mental harassment to his wife, and abetting her suicide along with her 21-month-old daughter on 20.11.2025. The court found prima facie evidence in the chargesheet and statements that the accused demanded ₹2 lakhs dowry and, when unsatisfied, subjected his wife to sustained cruelty and dushprerna (abetment), ultimately driving her to commit suicide with their child. The bail was denied to prevent potential witness intimidation and to deter crimes against women. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case