STATE OF GUJARAT vs NANIBEN W/O VIKRAMBHAI JAYANTIBHAI TALPADA Advocate - H K SHAH — 20/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 308. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJKH010008772025

Filing Number

20/2025

Filing Date

05-Feb-2025

Registration No

20/2025

Registration Date

05-Feb-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

7-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204047230190

Police Station

NADIAD WEST POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 308
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),81

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. N S ROHIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NANIBEN W/O VIKRAMBHAI JAYANTIBHAI TALPADA Advocate - H K SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Fifth Additional Sessions Court in Nadiad acquitted the defendant Naniben (accused of illegally manufacturing and selling adulterated liquor with chemical substances) on April 10, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt under IPC Section 308 and Prohibition Act Sections 65(A) and 81. The court noted critical deficiencies: the chain of custody for seized materials was not established, independent witnesses were absent, material evidence was never produced in court during trial, and the defendant's ownership and possession of the premises were unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    5th Addl District Judge

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    5th Addl District Judge

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    5th Addl District Judge

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  10. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  11. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  12. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  13. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  14. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  15. 24-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  16. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  17. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  18. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  19. 06-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  20. 22-Aug-2025

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    5th Addl District Judge

  21. 08-Aug-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  22. 21-Jul-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  23. 05-Jul-2025

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  24. 23-Jun-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  25. 02-Jun-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  26. 14-May-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  27. 23-Apr-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  28. 26-Mar-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  29. 12-Mar-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  30. 19-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 05-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Fifth Additional Sessions Court in Nadiad acquitted the defendant Naniben (accused of illegally manufacturing and selling adulterated liquor with chemical substances) on April 10, 2026, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt under IPC Section 308 and Prohibition Act Sections 65(A) and 81. The court noted critical deficiencies: the chain of custody for seized materials was not established, independent witnesses were absent, material evidence was never produced in court during trial, and the defendant's ownership and possession of the premises were unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case