LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE SANJAY KANUBHAI THAKOR(Legal Heir) vs BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. — 338/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJKH010008562026

Filing Number

338/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

338/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 141

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE SANJAY KANUBHAI THAKOR(Legal Heir)

    Adv. B B GANDHI1.

  2. 2.SURAJBEN SHANABHAI RATHOD

    Adv. B B GANDHI1.

  3. 3.DIPAKKUMAR KANUBHAI RATHOD

    Adv. B B GANDHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Principal District Judge of Kheda at Nadiad approved the insurance company's deposit of Rs. 14,75,000 and ordered its distribution to two claimants—Surajben Shanabhai Thakor and Dipakkumar Kanubhai Thakor—each receiving Rs. 3,68,750 as direct bank transfer and Rs. 3,68,750 invested in a 5-year fixed deposit. Payments require personal verification and the bank is prohibited from granting loans against the fixed deposits without tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 338/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District Judge of Kheda at Nadiad approved the insurance company's deposit of Rs. 14,75,000 and ordered its distribution to two claimants—Surajben Shanabhai Thakor and Dipakkumar Kanubhai Thakor—each receiving Rs. 3,68,750 as direct bank transfer and Rs. 3,68,750 invested in a 5-year fixed deposit. Payments require personal verification and the bank is prohibited from granting loans against the fixed deposits without tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case