HEIRS OF LATE MAAJMAHMAD ARIFBHAI VHORA(Legal Heir) vs ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD — 335/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJKH010008362026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
335/2026
Filing Date
12-02-2026
Registration No
335/2026
Registration Date
12-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HEIRS OF LATE MAAJMAHMAD ARIFBHAI VHORA(Legal Heir)
Adv. V B RATHOD1.
ARIFBHAI USMANGANI VHORA
Adv. V B RATHOD1.
RASHIDABEN ARIFBHAI VHORA
Adv. V B RATHOD
Respondent(s)
ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District Judge of Kheda at Nadiad directed the insurance company's deposited amount of Rs. 17,75,058/- to be distributed between two claimants (Arifbhai Usmangani Vahora and Rasidaben Arifbhai Vahora) with each receiving Rs. 3,55,012/- in their bank accounts and Rs. 5,32,517/- each invested in 5-year fixed deposits, following the High Court's order in F.A. No. 788 of 2024. Payment shall be made only after due verification and personal appearance, with the bank prohibited from granting loans against the FDs without tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District Judge of Kheda at Nadiad directed the insurance company's deposited amount of Rs. 17,75,058/- to be distributed between two claimants (Arifbhai Usmangani Vahora and Rasidaben Arifbhai Vahora) with each receiving Rs. 3,55,012/- in their bank accounts and Rs. 5,32,517/- each invested in 5-year fixed deposits, following the High Court's order in F.A. No. 788 of 2024. Payment shall be made only after due verification and personal appearance, with the bank prohibited from granting loans against the FDs without tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts