RIYAZ SAFIMOHAMMAD VAHORA vs MOHIN MEHBUBBHAI CHHIPA Advocate - L U PATHAN — 69/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJKH010007582026

Filing Number

69/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

69/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 139

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RIYAZ SAFIMOHAMMAD VAHORA

    Adv. V N PATHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHIN MEHBUBBHAI CHHIPA Advocate - L U PATHAN

  2. 2.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. D R BAROT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court allowed the appeal and set aside the lower court's conviction order dated 25/11/2025 against the appellant. However, during the appeal proceedings, the parties reached a settlement whereby the appellant paid the cheque amount to the respondent, and the court approved this settlement under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, thereby quashing the criminal proceedings and acquitting the appellant. The original lower court order is set aside and the case is remitted for compliance with the settlement terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Respondents

    Principal District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 69/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the appeal and set aside the lower court's conviction order dated 25/11/2025 against the appellant. However, during the appeal proceedings, the parties reached a settlement whereby the appellant paid the cheque amount to the respondent, and the court approved this settlement under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, thereby quashing the criminal proceedings and acquitting the appellant. The original lower court order is set aside and the case is remitted for compliance with the settlement terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case