AMARATBEN DINESHBHAI SODHAPARMAR vs RAJENDRAKUMAR ARJUNBHAI KATVA — 93/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJKH010005322026
Filing Number
93/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
93/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMARATBEN DINESHBHAI SODHAPARMAR
Adv. D V PATEL
Respondent(s)
RAJENDRAKUMAR ARJUNBHAI KATVA
SHUBHAM DIPAK BRAHMAN
SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 30-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: M.A.C.P. No. 93/2026 The Lok Adalat (MACT) approved a compromise settlement in this motor accident compensation case where the petitioner Amaratben Dineshbhai Sodhaparmar recovered Rs. 7,50,000 from the respondents (including Rs. 4,00,000 for medical bills). The court ordered the insurance company to deposit the awarded amount in a designated district bank account via RTGS/NEFT, with disbursement to follow after deposit confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: M.A.C.P. No. 93/2026 The Lok Adalat (MACT) approved a compromise settlement in this motor accident compensation case where the petitioner Amaratben Dineshbhai Sodhaparmar recovered Rs. 7,50,000 from the respondents (including Rs. 4,00,000 for medical bills). The court ordered the insurance company to deposit the awarded amount in a designated district bank account via RTGS/NEFT, with disbursement to follow after deposit confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts