AMARATBEN DINESHBHAI SODHAPARMAR vs RAJENDRAKUMAR ARJUNBHAI KATVA — 93/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJKH010005322026

Filing Number

93/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

93/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMARATBEN DINESHBHAI SODHAPARMAR

    Adv. D V PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRAKUMAR ARJUNBHAI KATVA

  2. 2.SHUBHAM DIPAK BRAHMAN

  3. 3.SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: M.A.C.P. No. 93/2026 The Lok Adalat (MACT) approved a compromise settlement in this motor accident compensation case where the petitioner Amaratben Dineshbhai Sodhaparmar recovered Rs. 7,50,000 from the respondents (including Rs. 4,00,000 for medical bills). The court ordered the insurance company to deposit the awarded amount in a designated district bank account via RTGS/NEFT, with disbursement to follow after deposit confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 93/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: M.A.C.P. No. 93/2026 The Lok Adalat (MACT) approved a compromise settlement in this motor accident compensation case where the petitioner Amaratben Dineshbhai Sodhaparmar recovered Rs. 7,50,000 from the respondents (including Rs. 4,00,000 for medical bills). The court ordered the insurance company to deposit the awarded amount in a designated district bank account via RTGS/NEFT, with disbursement to follow after deposit confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case