RAJESHBHAI MANGALBHAI SODHAPARMAR vs STATE OF GUJARAT — 173/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 18th May 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJKH010004382026

Filing Number

173/2026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

173/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

18-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 141

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESHBHAI MANGALBHAI SODHAPARMAR

    Adv. K B PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: RAJESHBHAI MANGALBHAI SODHAPARMAR v. STATE OF GUJARAT (173/2026) The Principal District Judge at Nadiad allowed Rajeshbhai Mangalbhai Sodhaparmar's application to sue as an indigent person under Order-33, CPC, as the State produced no evidence to disprove his indigency claim. The court permitted him to file a Motor Accident Claim Petition in forma pauperism, with court fees to be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 04-May-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 173/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RAJESHBHAI MANGALBHAI SODHAPARMAR v. STATE OF GUJARAT (173/2026) The Principal District Judge at Nadiad allowed Rajeshbhai Mangalbhai Sodhaparmar's application to sue as an indigent person under Order-33, CPC, as the State produced no evidence to disprove his indigency claim. The court permitted him to file a Motor Accident Claim Petition in forma pauperism, with court fees to be recovered after adjudication as the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case