RAMTUBHAI MAGANBHAI PARMAR vs SAMARTHKUMAR DINESHBHAI KANUBHAI OZA Advocate - U P PATEL — 6/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 04th May 2026.
MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: GJKH010004012026
Filing Number
6/2026
Filing Date
22-Jan-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
22-Jan-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMTUBHAI MAGANBHAI PARMAR
Adv. H R PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAMARTHKUMAR DINESHBHAI KANUBHAI OZA Advocate - U P PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal at Nadiad granted Ramtubhai Maganbhai Parmar's execution petition to enforce an award dated 27-02-2025 from MACP No. 843/2018. The tribunal issued a Recovery Certificate under Section 174 of the Motor Vehicle Act and directed it to the Collector, Kheda for recovery of the due amount in the manner of land revenue arrears, as the respondent filed no objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
24-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
15-Apr-2026
Reply
Principal District Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Reply
Principal District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal District Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2026
The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal at Nadiad granted Ramtubhai Maganbhai Parmar's execution petition to enforce an award dated 27-02-2025 from MACP No. 843/2018. The tribunal issued a Recovery Certificate under Section 174 of the Motor Vehicle Act and directed it to the Collector, Kheda for recovery of the due amount in the manner of land revenue arrears, as the respondent filed no objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts