VIRALIBEN PUSHPENDRAKUMAR PATEL vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT — 65/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJKH010003402026

Filing Number

65/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

65/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIRALIBEN PUSHPENDRAKUMAR PATEL

    Adv. D S BRAHMBHATT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D R BAROT

  2. 2.KALPESHBHAI MAHENDRABHAI PATEL

    Adv. D S SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge allowed the applicant's request to condone a 196-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against an acquittal order from May 2025, citing ignorance and financial loss as sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1963. The court granted the application subject to the applicant depositing Rs. 2,000 with the District Legal Services Authority, Nadiad, after which the criminal appeal would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 65/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge allowed the applicant's request to condone a 196-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against an acquittal order from May 2025, citing ignorance and financial loss as sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1963. The court granted the application subject to the applicant depositing Rs. 2,000 with the District Legal Services Authority, Nadiad, after which the criminal appeal would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case