HEIR OF DECEASE RAKESH SHANKAR KHARADI(Legal Heir) vs SALVI SURESHBHAI BHAJAJI — 68/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 06th June 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJKH010003212022

Filing Number

68/2022

Filing Date

08-Feb-2022

Registration No

68/2022

Registration Date

08-Feb-2022

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

6-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

06-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEIR OF DECEASE RAKESH SHANKAR KHARADI(Legal Heir)

    Adv. K.B.PATEL1.

  2. 2.SHANKAR RUPA 1.

  3. 3.SAVITADEVI SHANKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SALVI SURESHBHAI BHAJAJI

  2. 2.GANDHINAGAR DIVISION NURSARY VIBHAG

    Adv. U A DHAGAT

  3. 3.THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.

    Adv. M M MALEK

  4. 4.PAVAK VAKSI COTED

  5. 5.ICICI LOMB. GEN. INS. CO. LTD.

    Adv. A C SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Jun-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: M.A.C.P. 62/2022 and 68/2022 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation to the legal heirs of two deceased victims from a single accident involving a motorcycle-truck collision. The tribunal found the truck driver 70% negligent and the motorcycle rider 30% negligent. Claimants in case 62/2022 received Rs. 9,63,296 and claimants in case 68/2022 received Rs. 14,24,136, with New India Assurance Company (truck insurer) and ICICI Lombard (motorcycle insurer) jointly liable for payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Final Arguments

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 11-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    3rd Addl District Judge

  6. 07-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    3rd Addl District Judge

  7. 07-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    3rd Addl District Judge

  8. 04-May-2026

    Final Arguments

    3rd Addl District Judge

  9. 13-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    3rd Addl District Judge

  10. 30-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    3rd Addl District Judge

  11. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    3rd Addl District Judge

  12. 23-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    3rd Addl District Judge

  13. 09-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    3rd Addl District Judge

  14. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  15. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  16. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  17. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  18. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  19. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  20. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  21. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  22. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  23. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  24. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  25. 30-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  26. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  27. 22-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  28. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  29. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  30. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  31. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  32. 24-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  33. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  34. 30-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  35. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  36. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  37. 08-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  38. 18-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  39. 18-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  40. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  41. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Opponent

    3rd Addl District Judge

  42. 09-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Opponent

    4th Addl District Judge

  43. 09-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Opponent

    4th Addl District Judge

  44. 11-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Opponent

    4th Addl District Judge

  45. 26-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    4th Addl District Judge

  46. 06-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    4th Addl District Judge

  47. 06-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    4th Addl District Judge

  48. 09-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Appellant

    4th Addl District Judge

  49. 09-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    4th Addl District Judge

  50. 12-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Appellant

    4th Addl District Judge

  51. 12-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Appellant

    4th Addl District Judge

  52. 20-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Appellant

    4th Addl District Judge

  53. 20-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Appellant

    4th Addl District Judge

  54. 14-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Appellant

    4th Addl District Judge

  55. 07-Oct-2023

    Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  56. 07-Oct-2023

    Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  57. 18-Sep-2023

    Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  58. 18-Sep-2023

    Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  59. 21-Aug-2023

    Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  60. 17-Jul-2023

    Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  61. 19-Jun-2023

    Reply

    4th Addl District Judge

  62. 18-Apr-2023

    Reply

    Principal District Judge

  63. 14-Feb-2023

    Reply

    Principal District Judge

  64. 20-Dec-2022

    Reply

    Principal District Judge

  65. 11-Nov-2022

    Reply

    Principal District Judge

  66. 04-Oct-2022

    Reply

    Principal District Judge

  67. 26-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  68. 27-Jun-2022

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  69. 15-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  70. 08-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 68/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: M.A.C.P. 62/2022 and 68/2022 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation to the legal heirs of two deceased victims from a single accident involving a motorcycle-truck collision. The tribunal found the truck driver 70% negligent and the motorcycle rider 30% negligent. Claimants in case 62/2022 received Rs. 9,63,296 and claimants in case 68/2022 received Rs. 14,24,136, with New India Assurance Company (truck insurer) and ICICI Lombard (motorcycle insurer) jointly liable for payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case