HEIR OF DECEASE VIKASBHAI DINESHBHAI RATHOD(Legal Heir) vs MAHENDRASINH VARSUBHA GOHIL Advocate - N.S.ROHIT — 91/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 05th May 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJKH010002882021
Filing Number
91/2021
Filing Date
21-Jan-2021
Registration No
91/2021
Registration Date
21-Jan-2021
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
5-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HEIR OF DECEASE VIKASBHAI DINESHBHAI RATHOD(Legal Heir)
Adv. V B RATHOD1.
-
2.DINESHBHAI RAMABHAI RATHOD 1.
-
3.KALIBEN DINESHBHAI RATHOD
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHENDRASINH VARSUBHA GOHIL Advocate - N.S.ROHIT
-
2.ICICI LOMB. GEN. INS. CO. LTD.
Adv. A.C.SHAH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: M.A.C.P. No. 91/2021 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded ₹12,00,240 to the legal heirs of deceased Vikasbhai Dineshbhai Rathod, who died in a motorcycle accident on September 10, 2016, caused by negligent driving. The tribunal found that motorcycle driver Virsangbhai Mahotbhai Zala was driving recklessly at excessive speed, lost control, and hit a divider, killing the pillion rider. Both the vehicle owner and ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company were held jointly and severally liable, with compensation comprising future dependency loss (₹11,64,240), funeral expenses (₹18,000), and loss of estate (₹18,000), plus 7.5% annual interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
27-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
24-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
18-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Opponent
4th Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Opponents Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Opponents Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
Opponents Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Opponents Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Opponents Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Opponents Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
02-Dec-2025
Opponents Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Opponents Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
27-Oct-2025
Opponents Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Opponents Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
Opponents Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
22-Jul-2025
Opponents Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
Opponents Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
10-Jun-2025
Opponents Evidence
4th Addl District Judge
-
21-Apr-2025
Opponents Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Mar-2025
Opponents Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2025
Opponents Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Feb-2025
Opponents Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
04-Feb-2025
Opponents Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
21-Jan-2025
Opponents Evidence
3rd Addl District Judge
-
10-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
05-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
07-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
31-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
20-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
09-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
22-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
05-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
26-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
28-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
16-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
04-Sep-2023
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
31-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
10-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
12-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
01-May-2023
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Apr-2023
Evidence Of Applicant
3rd Addl District Judge
-
20-Mar-2023
Reply
3rd Addl District Judge
-
06-Feb-2023
Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
26-Dec-2022
Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
21-Nov-2022
Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
03-Oct-2022
Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
22-Aug-2022
Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
18-Jul-2022
Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
16-May-2022
Reply
2nd Addl District Judge
-
25-Nov-2021
Summons - Notice
3rd Addl District Judge
-
03-Sep-2021
Summons - Notice
3rd Addl District Judge
-
25-Jun-2021
Summons - Notice
4th Addl District Judge
-
15-Apr-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 91/2021
Case Summary: M.A.C.P. No. 91/2021 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded ₹12,00,240 to the legal heirs of deceased Vikasbhai Dineshbhai Rathod, who died in a motorcycle accident on September 10, 2016, caused by negligent driving. The tribunal found that motorcycle driver Virsangbhai Mahotbhai Zala was driving recklessly at excessive speed, lost control, and hit a divider, killing the pillion rider. Both the vehicle owner and ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company were held jointly and severally liable, with compensation comprising future dependency loss (₹11,64,240), funeral expenses (₹18,000), and loss of estate (₹18,000), plus 7.5% annual interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts