NATHABHAI ARJANBHAI BHETARIYA vs VIJYABEN GAGJIBHAI BHETARIYA Advocate - S.D.CHAGLANI — 76/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 096. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 07th April 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJJN220003772018
Filing Number
76/2018
Filing Date
01-12-2017
Registration No
76/2018
Registration Date
01-12-2017
Court
Additional Court, Vanthali
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NATHABHAI ARJANBHAI BHETARIYA
Adv. R.B.BHATT
DEVASIBHAI ARJANBHAI BHETARIYA
Respondent(s)
VIJYABEN GAGJIBHAI BHETARIYA Advocate - S.D.CHAGLANI
HAJABHAI GAGAJIBHAI BHETARIYA
RAMBHAI GAGAJIBHAI BHETARIYA
VIJYABEN GAGJIBHAI BHETARIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 12-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 05-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 26-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RDA 76/2018 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the appeal filed by Nathabhai Arjanbhai Bhetariya and Devasibhai Arjanbhai Bhetariya against the trial court's judgment. The court upheld the trial court's decision recognizing the respondents (Vijyaben and others) as rightful owners of the disputed agricultural land based on a registered 1971 sale deed, rejecting appellants' claims of forgery and their counter-claim. Key Reasoning: The court found that the appellants failed to prove their allegations that the 1971 sale document was fraudulent or that their father was mentally/physically incapable of executing it. Revenue record entry gaps do not affect ownership rights established by registered sale deeds, as property transfer occurs through the sale instrument itself, not revenue entries. The appellants' counter-claim was properly dismissed as it contradicted the already-established document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RDA 76/2018 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the appeal filed by Nathabhai Arjanbhai Bhetariya and Devasibhai Arjanbhai Bhetariya against the trial court's judgment. The court upheld the trial court's decision recognizing the respondents (Vijyaben and others) as rightful owners of the disputed agricultural land based on a registered 1971 sale deed, rejecting appellants' claims of forgery and their counter-claim. Key Reasoning: The court found that the appellants failed to prove their allegations that the 1971 sale document was fraudulent or that their father was mentally/physically incapable of executing it. Revenue record entry gaps do not affect ownership rights established by registered sale deeds, as property transfer occurs through the sale instrument itself, not revenue entries. The appellants' counter-claim was properly dismissed as it contradicted the already-established document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts