NATHABHAI ARJANBHAI BHETARIYA vs HERIS OF LT GAGJI DOSA BHETARIYA 1, ARJANBHAI GAGAJIBHAI BHETARIYA Advocate - S.D.CHAGLANI — 75/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 096. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 07th April 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJJN220003752018
Filing Number
75/2018
Filing Date
01-12-2017
Registration No
75/2018
Registration Date
01-12-2017
Court
Additional Court, Vanthali
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NATHABHAI ARJANBHAI BHETARIYA
Adv. R.B.BHATT
DEVASIBHAI ARJANBHAI BHETARIYA
Respondent(s)
HERIS OF LT GAGJI DOSA BHETARIYA 1, ARJANBHAI GAGAJIBHAI BHETARIYA Advocate - S.D.CHAGLANI
HAJABHAI GAGAJIBHAI BHETARIYA
RAMBHAI GAGAJIBHAI BHETARIYA
VIJYABEN GAGJIBHAI BHETARIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 12-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 05-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 26-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 75/2018 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's judgment in favor of the respondents (plaintiffs). The trial court's order recognizing the petitioners' father's 1971 registered sale deed as valid and confirming ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land in Chikhlodera village was upheld. Key Reasoning: The court found that the 1971 registered sale deed was properly executed and that revenue record entry is procedural only and does not determine ownership. Registered sale documents take priority over revenue records. The respondents proved ownership and possession through valid documentation, and the appellants failed to substantiate their counterclaims that the deed was fraudulent or that their father lacked mental capacity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 75/2018 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's judgment in favor of the respondents (plaintiffs). The trial court's order recognizing the petitioners' father's 1971 registered sale deed as valid and confirming ownership and possession of the disputed agricultural land in Chikhlodera village was upheld. Key Reasoning: The court found that the 1971 registered sale deed was properly executed and that revenue record entry is procedural only and does not determine ownership. Registered sale documents take priority over revenue records. The respondents proved ownership and possession through valid documentation, and the appellants failed to substantiate their counterclaims that the deed was fraudulent or that their father lacked mental capacity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts