THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PARAG HARSUKH GARALA Advocate - D A YADAV — 12/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(2)(N),354(A)(B)(C),365,506. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJJN220001622022
Filing Number
12/2022
Filing Date
06-03-2020
Registration No
12/2022
Registration Date
06-03-2020
Court
Additional Court, Vanthali
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
MANAVADAR POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. AGP
Respondent(s)
PARAG HARSUKH GARALA Advocate - D A YADAV
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused, Parag Harsukh Garul, of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 376(2)(n), 354(a)(b)(c), 366, and 506(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the allegations of rape and sexual harassment beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the victim's testimony lacked corroboration from medical evidence and witness statements, while the victim herself did not adequately support her own written complaint during examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused, Parag Harsukh Garul, of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 376(2)(n), 354(a)(b)(c), 366, and 506(2). The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the allegations of rape and sexual harassment beyond reasonable doubt, noting that the victim's testimony lacked corroboration from medical evidence and witness statements, while the victim herself did not adequately support her own written complaint during examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts