Vanitaben Jentibhai Katariya vs Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation — 9/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION

CNR: GJJN220000742026

Filing Number

9/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Additional Court, Vanthali

Judge

1-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vanitaben Jentibhai Katariya

    Adv. K L SANCHELA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case 9/2026 Summary: The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (Auxiliary), Vanthali allowed Vanitaben Jentibhai Katariya's application for disbursement of Rs. 46,196/- awarded in a prior motor accident claim (MACP 254/2018). The court directed payment of 30% (Rs. 13,079) directly to the injured claimant via cheque, while the remaining 70% (Rs. 30,517) be invested in a fixed deposit with a nationalized bank for five years, with the claimant entitled to receive periodic interest and the bank prohibited from creating any encumbrance without tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Urgent Hearing

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 9/2026 Summary: The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (Auxiliary), Vanthali allowed Vanitaben Jentibhai Katariya's application for disbursement of Rs. 46,196/- awarded in a prior motor accident claim (MACP 254/2018). The court directed payment of 30% (Rs. 13,079) directly to the injured claimant via cheque, while the remaining 70% (Rs. 30,517) be invested in a fixed deposit with a nationalized bank for five years, with the claimant entitled to receive periodic interest and the bank prohibited from creating any encumbrance without tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case