The State of Gujarat vs Mayurbhai Urfe Maylo Jivabhai Bhurabhai Bariya Advocate - V U VADAR — 1/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137(2),87,64(2)(M). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
PCSO - SPECIAL CASE - PCSO
CNR: GJJN220000062025
Filing Number
1/2025
Filing Date
04-01-2025
Registration No
1/2025
Registration Date
04-01-2025
Court
Additional Court, Vanthali
Judge
1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203068240626
Police Station
VANTHALI POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Gujarat
Adv. AGP
Respondent(s)
Mayurbhai Urfe Maylo Jivabhai Bhurabhai Bariya Advocate - V U VADAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-3rd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 11-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 25-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The Wantali Additional Sessions Court acquitted the defendant under the POSCO Act on March 23, 2026. Despite prosecution evidence that the victim was a minor (17 years, 3 months old) at the time of the alleged kidnapping and rape on November 13, 2024, the court found the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The victim's testimony, medical examinations, and documentary evidence were deemed insufficient and internally inconsistent to establish the allegations conclusively against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The Wantali Additional Sessions Court acquitted the defendant under the POSCO Act on March 23, 2026. Despite prosecution evidence that the victim was a minor (17 years, 3 months old) at the time of the alleged kidnapping and rape on November 13, 2024, the court found the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The victim's testimony, medical examinations, and documentary evidence were deemed insufficient and internally inconsistent to establish the allegations conclusively against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts