DAUDBHAI HAJIBHAI LAKHA vs DIPESH RAMESHBHAI PANCHASARA — 78/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 08th April 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJJN210012032025
Filing Number
78/2025
Filing Date
24-09-2025
Registration No
78/2025
Registration Date
24-09-2025
Court
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD
Judge
2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DAUDBHAI HAJIBHAI LAKHA
Adv. K L SANCHELA
Respondent(s)
DIPESH RAMESHBHAI PANCHASARA
THE ZURICH KOTAK GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. P M HIRPARA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 18-02-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 28-01-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
| 24-12-2025 | WRITTEN STATEMENT/REPLY |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Keshod MACT dismissed the motor accident compensation petition (MACP No.78-2025) because the claimant had filed multiple petitions for the same accident before different tribunals (Dhoraji MACT and Rajkot MACT). The court held that such multiple filings are not maintainable under Indian law and constitute an attempt to obtain double or triple compensation benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Keshod MACT dismissed the motor accident compensation petition (MACP No.78-2025) because the claimant had filed multiple petitions for the same accident before different tribunals (Dhoraji MACT and Rajkot MACT). The court held that such multiple filings are not maintainable under Indian law and constitute an attempt to obtain double or triple compensation benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts