HITESH MANSUKHLAL POMAL vs RAKESH RAMJIBHAI MORVADIYA — 12/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: GJJN210008972025

Filing Number

12/2025

Filing Date

05-Jul-2025

Registration No

12/2025

Registration Date

05-Jul-2025

Court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD

Judge

1-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HITESH MANSUKHLAL POMAL

    Adv. B L SINDHAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH RAMJIBHAI MORVADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Order

    The execution petition filed for recovery of amount was dismissed for default on 06-05-2026 by the 2nd Additional District Judge at Keshod. The court found that although notice was served and a recovery warrant issued, the bailiff reported no attachable property, and the applicant failed to provide details of any opponent's property from which recovery could be made, rendering further proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Recovery Warrant

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Recovery Warrant

    2nd Addl District Judge

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Recovery Warrant

    2nd Addl District Judge

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Recovery Warrant

    2nd Addl District Judge

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Recovery Warrant

    2nd Addl District Judge

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Recovery Warrant

    2nd Addl District Judge

  10. 11-Feb-2026

    Recovery Warrant

    2nd Addl District Judge

  11. 31-Jan-2026

    Recovery Warrant

    2nd Addl District Judge

  12. 17-Jan-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  13. 02-Jan-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  14. 12-Dec-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  15. 28-Nov-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  16. 19-Nov-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  17. 29-Oct-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  18. 08-Oct-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  19. 24-Sep-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  20. 10-Sep-2025

    Notice To Opponents

    2nd Addl District Judge

  21. 20-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 05-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The execution petition filed for recovery of amount was dismissed for default on 06-05-2026 by the 2nd Additional District Judge at Keshod. The court found that although notice was served and a recovery warrant issued, the bailiff reported no attachable property, and the applicant failed to provide details of any opponent's property from which recovery could be made, rendering further proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case