HITESH MANSUKHLAL POMAL vs RAKESH RAMJIBHAI MORVADIYA — 12/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 06th May 2026.
MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: GJJN210008972025
Filing Number
12/2025
Filing Date
05-07-2025
Registration No
12/2025
Registration Date
05-07-2025
Court
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD
Judge
1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HITESH MANSUKHLAL POMAL
Adv. B L SINDHAVA
Respondent(s)
RAKESH RAMJIBHAI MORVADIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
RECOVERY WARRANT
RECOVERY WARRANT
RECOVERY WARRANT
RECOVERY WARRANT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | RECOVERY WARRANT |
| 18-04-2026 | RECOVERY WARRANT |
| 15-04-2026 | RECOVERY WARRANT |
| 25-03-2026 | RECOVERY WARRANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The execution petition filed for recovery of amount was dismissed for default on 06-05-2026 by the 2nd Additional District Judge at Keshod. The court found that although notice was served and a recovery warrant issued, the bailiff reported no attachable property, and the applicant failed to provide details of any opponent's property from which recovery could be made, rendering further proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The execution petition filed for recovery of amount was dismissed for default on 06-05-2026 by the 2nd Additional District Judge at Keshod. The court found that although notice was served and a recovery warrant issued, the bailiff reported no attachable property, and the applicant failed to provide details of any opponent's property from which recovery could be made, rendering further proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts